Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+1222%
3.174 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250M
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
28W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N10E-GE-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
