Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
+930%
3.174 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
