Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Intel Arc A380M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2000MHz vs 1350MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M
4.096 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +170%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2017
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
96bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Vega 10
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy