Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FirePro D300

Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A580 +464%
12.29 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Jan 2014
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
1280
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Pitcairn
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy