Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FirePro S9150

Intel Arc A580 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A580 +142%
12.29 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

175W
TDP
235W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy