Intel Arc A580 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A580 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A580 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A580
+35014%
12.29 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2023
Release Date
Oct 2009
Alchemist(Arc 5)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1700 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
384
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
192.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
384.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
24.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.29 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
1.536 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
175W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
