Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +53650%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy