Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro V3700

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +26775%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
3584
Shading Units
40
224
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy