Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro V5900

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +2701%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
3584
Shading Units
512
224
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Cayman
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy