Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W4300

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +1104%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Dec 2015
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
112
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Bonaire
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy