Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +254%
17.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A750 +237%
12425
Radeon R9 290
3684
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
160
112
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
275W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy