Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 8GB VRAM CMP 170HX 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2400MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.49TB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770
+55%
19.66 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX 8 GB
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Sep 2021
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
2100 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.49TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
70
4096
Shading Units
4480
256
TMUs
280
128
ROPs
128
512
Tensor Cores
280
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GA100
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
