Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A770 vs ATI FirePro V4900

Intel Arc A770 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A770 +2459%
19.66 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2011
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
480
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
614.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
39.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.66 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
2.458 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Turks
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy