Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

VS

Intel Arc A770 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 6 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 51% (2400MHz vs 1590MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

3200 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A770 +590%

19.66 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

2.849 TFLOPS

Blender

Arc A770 +277%

2085

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

552

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A770 +221%

45

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

14

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A770 +175%

80

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

29

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A770 +138%

105

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

44

Arc A770

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Apr 2020

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz

Base Clock

1410 MHz

2400 MHz

Boost Clock

1590 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

14

-

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

896

256

TMUs

56

128

ROPs

32

512

Tensor Cores

-

32

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

50.88 GPixel/s

614.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

89.04 GTexel/s

39.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

5.699 TFLOPS

19.66 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.849 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

TU117

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

TU117-300-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

225W

TDP

75W

550 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

3

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

4

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

5

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

6

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

8

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710

9

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

10

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip