Intel Arc A770M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1650MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A770M
+1596%
13.52 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Arc A770M
+886%
10649
GeForce MX250
1079
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Arc A770M
+2187%
5078
GeForce MX250
222
Blender
Arc A770M
+2280%
1714
GeForce MX250
72
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
4096
Shading Units
384
256
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
211.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
422.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
27.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GP108B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
