Intel Arc A780 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+56212%
18.02 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
40
256
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
200W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
