Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FireStream 9270

Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FireStream 9270

Intel Arc A780
VS
AMD FireStream 9270
Intel Arc A780
AMD FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A780 +1401%
18.02 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
800
256
TMUs
40
128
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
160W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy