Intel Arc A780 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+3677%
18.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2008
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
28
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
182W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT200
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
