Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A780 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

Intel Arc A780 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 559.6GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A780
18.02 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000 +36%
24.58 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
8192
256
TMUs
512
128
ROPs
512
512
Tensor Cores
128
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
450W
550 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net