Intel Arc A780 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (2550MHz vs 2200MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 559.6GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
18.02 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+262%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2023
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
100
4096
Shading Units
12800
256
TMUs
400
128
ROPs
176
512
Tensor Cores
400
32
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
AD102
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
AD102
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
