Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A300

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs AMD FirePro A300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 149% (2250MHz vs 905MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (28W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile +563%
4.608 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2023
Release Date
Jun 2012
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

72.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
144.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
9.216 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

28W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Xe-LPG
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy