Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 35W)
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2350MHz vs 1800MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
1.382 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+248%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2023
Release Date
Jan 2025
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1800 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
43.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
2.765 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1382 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
28W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Meteor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Xe-LPG
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
