Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD FirePro M2000

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +753%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
1024
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Turks
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy