Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD FirePro M8900

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +213%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Blackcomb
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy