Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Intel Arc Pro A30M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Intel Arc Pro A30M
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (2000MHz vs 1594MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +234%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GP108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy