Intel Arc Pro A40 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
+10781%
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV620
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
