Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
3.482 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+129%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Capsaicin
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0
