Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W9000

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +20%
4.813 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy