Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +1059%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2012
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1024
Shading Units
144
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net