Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (2350MHz vs 1590MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A50 +68%
4.813 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy