Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 410M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 512MB VRAM GeForce 410M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 410M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +4740%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce 410M
0.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jan 2011
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
48
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.148 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.592 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
110.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
9.176 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
GF119
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
N12M-GS
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.292 billion
Unknown
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy