Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 135W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (52.48GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512 +890%
0.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
820 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
52.48GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
40
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
416.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
135W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
G92
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
G92-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy