Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS Mac Edition +121%
0.093 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
32.26GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
40
Shading Units
32
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
G84
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy