Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +2921%
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GM206
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy