Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +153495%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
5376
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Navi 31
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy