Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs ATI FirePro V3750

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs ATI FirePro V3750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 48W)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750 +738%
0.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
48W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
RV730
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO (215-0719056)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy