Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +9652%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy