Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +6342%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GA107
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy