Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
1112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +6293%
2.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1152
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy