Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290 +225%
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Dec 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
2
40
Shading Units
80
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy