Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX +5216%
7.603 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
TU106
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy