Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP +346%
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
RV620
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy