Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro D300

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +1421%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy