Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V4800

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 69W)
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800 +333%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
400
8
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Redwood
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy