Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro V5900

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +329%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cayman
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy