Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V7900

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +1197%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Cayman
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy