Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP +615%
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
120
Shading Units
8
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.080 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.68 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT218
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
8400GS-225-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy