Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +1374%
2.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
960
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GK106
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy