Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +9354%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
120
Shading Units
2560
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
AD107
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy