Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
NVS 510 +113%
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
192
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GK107
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy